<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/static/oaitohtml.xsl"?>

<!--
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
-->

<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <responseDate>2026-10-12T18:26:49Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="10.57760/sciencedb.0129b" >https://www.scidb.cn/oai</request>
<GetRecord>
    <record>
    <header >
    <identifier>10.57760/sciencedb.0129b</identifier>
    <datestamp>2026-09-11T10:30:42Z</datestamp>
</header>
    <metadata>
        
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:date>2026-09-11</dc:date>
  <dc:title>Towards the Limits of Spatial Resolution in Preclinical PET: Prototype Validation and High-Sensitivity Dual-Layer Extension</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.57760/sciencedb.0129b</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:description>	High spatial resolution and sensitivity are paramount in preclinical positron emission tomography (PET). Thicker scintillators improve detection efficiency but increase depth-of-interaction (DOI) parallax, whereas thinner scintillators reduce depth uncertainty at the expense of sensitivity. We developed and experimentally evaluated a compact PET scanner utilizing 0.579-mm-pitch, 5-mm-thick lutetium yttrium orthosilicate (LYSO) crystal arrays (0.497 &amp;times; 0.497 &amp;times; 5 mm3) and investigated a higher-sensitivity dual-layer architecture with discrete DOI encoding through simulation. The prototype achieved an energy resolution (full width at half maximum, FWHM) of 13.43% &amp;plusmn; 1.95% at 511 keV, a peak sensitivity of 0.87% (350&amp;ndash;650 keV window), a peak noise-equivalent count rate of 6.02 kcps, and a scatter fraction of 8.92%. Filtered back-projection yielded mean radial, tangential, and axial spatial resolutions (FWHM) of 0.90, 0.86, and 0.69 mm, respectively, reaching a minimum axial FWHM of 0.48 mm. Micro-Derenzo phantom imaging demonstrated sub-0.5-mm contrast modulation, with mean peak-to-valley ratios of 1.65 and 1.48 for the 0.45- and 0.40-mm rod sectors. In 18F-NaF murine imaging, the computed tomography (CT)-referenced structural similarity index was 0.79, versus 0.67 for a commercial scanner. Three configurations retained the prototype as the inner-layer detector ring, adding outer crystals with thicknesses of 5, 7.5, or 10 mm, and expanded axial coverage. Simulated peak sensitivity increased monotonically to 3.10%, 4.27%, and 5.36% (up to a 4.36&amp;times; gain over the baseline), while spatial resolution degradation remained constrained due to a high fraction (71.1%&amp;ndash;85.7%) of coincidences retaining inner-layer interaction endpoints. These results validate the prototype&amp;rsquo;s state-of-the-art spatial resolution and establish a viable architectural blueprint for next-generation DOI-PET systems.</dc:description>
  <dc:subject>Positron emission tomography; high-resolution imaging; depth-of-interaction; instrumentation</dc:subject>
  <dc:creator>Chenxi Li</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Leran Wang</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Haoqi Wen</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Yuhao Jiang</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Runze Liao</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Yaping Luo</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Boxuan Shi</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Jianyong Jiang</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights>PUBLIC</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
  <dc:type>dataset</dc:type>
  <dc:publisher>Science Data Bank</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>

    </metadata>
</record>
</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>