<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/static/oaitohtml.xsl"?>

<!--
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
-->

<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <responseDate>2026-10-12T18:28:14Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="10.57760/sciencedb.11602" >https://www.scidb.cn/oai</request>
<GetRecord>
    <record>
    <header >
    <identifier>10.57760/sciencedb.11602</identifier>
    <datestamp>2025-09-23T15:57:56Z</datestamp>
</header>
    <metadata>
        
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:date>2025-09-23</dc:date>
  <dc:title>Assessing  Pro-Environmental Behavior in China: A Study on the Validity of the Simplified PEBT Paradigm</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.57760/sciencedb.11602</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:description>In this study, we aimede to evaluate the vaildty of the Pro-environmrntal Behavior Task(PEBT) paradigm within the Chinese context. The following data were collected and analyzed:Participants: We recruited 299 Chinese university students to participate in the experiment. Among these, 71 individuals participated in a follow-up session four months after the initial experiment.Experimental Design: The PEBT was modified to include:Increased time differences between pro-environmental and non-pro-environmental choices.Reduced number of trials to streamline the experiment.Behavioral Measures:Participants chose between a bicycle (no CO2 emissions, longer wait time) and a car (more CO2 emissions, shorter wait time).The choices were used to measure pro-environmental behavior, with the hypothesis that shorter wait time differences and higher CO2 emissions would result in more pro-environmental behaviors.Reliability and Validity:Internal Consistency and Criterion Validity: Both were found to be acceptable when compared to the original version of the PEBT.Test-Retest Reliability: A moderate correlation (r = .60) was observed between pro-environmental choices in the initial and follow-up sessions, indicating that the PEBT is effective in measuring stable personal traits related to pro-environmental behavior.Additional Measures:Real Pro-Environmental Behavior: To validate the experimental outcomes with real behaviors, we incorporated measurements of participants' donation amounts to an environmental fund as an index of real pro-environmental behavior. This revealed a noteworthy correlation, further supporting the validity of the PEBT.This study provides valuable insights into the robustness and applicability of the PEBT paradigm in measuring pro-environmental behavior among Chinese participants, contributing to the broader field of environmental psychology.</dc:description>
  <dc:subject>Pro-Environmental behavior task; Measurement; Validity</dc:subject>
  <dc:creator>Zimeng Zhu</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Rui Tao</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Rui Zheng</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights>PUBLIC</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
  <dc:type>dataset</dc:type>
  <dc:publisher>Science Data Bank</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>

    </metadata>
</record>
</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>