<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/static/oaitohtml.xsl"?>

<!--
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
-->

<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <responseDate>2026-10-14T03:51:25Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="10.57760/sciencedb.21971" >https://www.scidb.cn/oai</request>
<GetRecord>
    <record>
    <header >
    <identifier>10.57760/sciencedb.21971</identifier>
    <datestamp>2025-03-17T16:20:12Z</datestamp>
</header>
    <metadata>
        
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:date>2025-03-17</dc:date>
  <dc:title>Pion emission source in pp collisions using the AMPT model with sub-nucleon structure</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.57760/sciencedb.21971</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:description>Based the on the fitting results, the \rcore values in each \kt interval are extracted for four different scenarios: (\rmnum{1}) before ART without further boost, (\rmnum{2}) before ART with a boost of $\tau\in[1.5,5]$ fm/$\it{c}$, (\rmnum{3}) after ART stage without boost, and (\rmnum{4}) after ART with a boost of $\tau\in[1,3]$ fm/$\it{c}$. In (\rmnum{2}), the upper limit originates from the general assumption that resonances with $\textit{c}\tau_\text{res} &amp;gt; 5$ fm are long-lived, while in (\rmnum{4}), the $\tau$ values are deliberately reduced to roughly match the results of (\rmnum{2}). Figure ~\ref{fig:FinalmTscaling} shows the \mt-scaling behavior of \rcore. It can be seen that all four cases are in line with the expectation that the source radii decrease as \mt increases, roughly following the power-law relationship~\cite{SourceMaxi}: $R_\text{core} = \it{a} + \it{b}\cdot\langle m_\text{T}\rangle^{\it{c}}$. This can be understood in terms of the collectivity generated since the partonic stage. Compared to the ALICE measurements (solid dots), the original AMPT sources (\rmnum{1}) and (\rmnum{3}), without additional boosting, are systematically smaller, while the modified cases of (\rmnum{2}) and (\rmnum{4}) are in good agreement with data in the low \mt ranges. Note that ALICE results also exhibit a plateau at $\mt &amp;lt; 0.5$~GeV/$\it{c}^\mathrm{2}$, which can be interpreted as the limitation of the system size in pp collisions. However, this feature is not observed in AMPT, which instead follows the power-law increasing tread. Generally, the AMPT provides a good environment to reveal the mechanisms behind system size and \mt-scaling, but further investigation is also required to understand the detailed behaviors.</dc:description>
  <dc:subject>Emission source; Femtoscopy; mT-scaling; ALICE experiment</dc:subject>
  <dc:creator>寿齐烨</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights>PUBLIC</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
  <dc:type>dataset</dc:type>
  <dc:relation>http://www.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-025-01722-3</dc:relation>
  <dc:publisher>Science Data Bank</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>

    </metadata>
</record>
</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>