<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/static/oaitohtml.xsl"?>

<!--
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
-->

<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <responseDate>2026-10-10T20:18:31Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="10.57760/sciencedb.32063" >https://www.scidb.cn/oai</request>
<GetRecord>
    <record>
    <header >
    <identifier>10.57760/sciencedb.32063</identifier>
    <datestamp>2025-11-24T10:34:30Z</datestamp>
</header>
    <metadata>
        
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:date>2025-11-24</dc:date>
  <dc:title>The Drivers of University Students' GenAI Dependency in Learning</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.57760/sciencedb.32063</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:description>Data were collected through Wenjuanxing.The final sample consisted of 1,384 valid responses after data cleaning.This study employed a structured questionnaire comprising five main sections. The first section collected demographic information including gender, grade, and major. The subsequent sections measured core constructs using established scales: a 6-item scale for AI dependency in learning(AIDL) was adapted from Ye et al. (2024); the 12-item AI literacy(AIL) scale from Wang et al. (2022)&amp;nbsp;covering awareness, usage, evaluation, and ethics dimensions; along with 8-item perceived risk(PR) and 4-item perceived benefit(PB) scales regarding GenAI use in learning, both revised from Ivanov et al. (2024). All items used a five-point Likert scale format (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). To ensure response quality, two reverse-scored items were included in the AI literacy section. All scales demonstrated satisfactory reliability in the current research context.</dc:description>
  <dc:subject>Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI); GenAI dependency; perceived benefit; per-ceived risk; AI literacy; polynomial regression; response surface analysis; university students</dc:subject>
  <dc:creator>Jin Zhu</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights>PUBLIC</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</dc:rights>
  <dc:type>dataset</dc:type>
  <dc:publisher>Science Data Bank</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>

    </metadata>
</record>
</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>