2026-10-13T02:38:04Z https://www.scidb.cn/oai

10.57760/sciencedb.45391 2026-08-20T16:21:10Z

2026-08-20 Data of the figure in "Nonadiabatic topological quantum state transfer in a continuous-variable system" doi:10.57760/sciencedb.45391 en 1.Fvst.xlxs:Time variations of average fidelity.2.FvsK_T.xlxs:Final average fidelity $\overline{F}(T)$ versus Kerr nonlinear parameter $K$ and total operation time $T$.3.systematic_error.xlxs:Final average fidelity $\overline{F}(T)$ versus systematic error rate $\epsilon_m$ ($m=1,2,3,4$).4.pulse.xlxs:Time variations of (a) adiabatic coupling strengths $\{\lambda_m^{\mathrm{ad}}|m=1,2,3,4\}$, (b) optimized coupling strengths $\{\lambda_m\}$, (c) additional coupling strengths $\{\lambda_m'=\lambda_m-\lambda_m^{\mathrm{ad}}\}$ added to the adiabatic coupling strengths.5.AWGN.xlxs:(a) Final average fidelity $\overline{F}(T)$ versus simulation count with $R_{SN}=10$. (b) Joint final average fidelity $\braket{\overline{F}(T)}$ versus $R_{SN}$.6.pulse_appendix.xlsx:(a) Kerr nonlinearity parameter $K$ and two-photon squeezing drive strength $\varepsilon_2$ for adiabatic amplification of the cat-state qubit. (b) full control parameters for gradient ascent optimized shortcuts. (c) additional control parameters $f_l$ ($l=1,2,3,4$) added in gradient ascent optimized shortcuts. (d) Fidelity $\mathcal{F}=|\mathrm{Tr}[\overline{U}^\dag{U}(t)P_0]|^2/4$ of the amplification.7.decoherence.xlxs:Final average fidelity $\overline{F}(T)$ versus resonator decay rates $\kappa$ and $\kappa'$. Quantum state transfer; Cat-state qubit; Gradient ascent algorithm Yi-Hao Kang EMBARGO https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ dataset Science Data Bank