<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/static/oaitohtml.xsl"?>

<!--
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
-->

<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <responseDate>2026-10-12T19:57:13Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="10.57760/sciencedb.j00052.00194" >https://www.scidb.cn/oai</request>
<GetRecord>
    <record>
    <header >
    <identifier>10.57760/sciencedb.j00052.00194</identifier>
    <datestamp>2025-10-13T08:49:48Z</datestamp>
</header>
    <metadata>
        
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:date>2025-10-13</dc:date>
  <dc:title>Scale Assessment Dataset on Mental Health Risk Factors for Chinese Expatriate Construction Workers in High-Risk Environments in Iraq​​</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.57760/sciencedb.j00052.00194</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:description>This dataset originates from a special mental health survey conducted by a construction company targeting employees assigned to work at an oilfield in a Middle Eastern region. The dataset mainly consists of two documents: raw scale score data and a mental health assessment questionnaire. The following sections describe the data generation process, content structure, spatiotemporal information, and data characteristics:1. Data Generation Process and Processing Methods&amp;bull; Survey Design: A cross-sectional research design was adopted. An online questionnaire was distributed to 400 on-site employees in the Middle Eastern region (April&amp;ndash;May 2024). A total of 326 valid responses were collected (valid response rate: 81.5%).&amp;bull; Assessment Tools: Eight standardized scales were used to comprehensively evaluate mental health status, including:◦ General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12)◦ Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9, depression screening)◦ Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)◦ Maslach Burnout Inventory &amp;ndash; General Survey (MBI-GS-15)◦ Core Occupational Stress Scale (COSS-17)◦ Social Support Survey (8 items)◦ Iraq-Specific Social Environmental Stress Questionnaire (10 items)◦ Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI-9)2. Spatiotemporal Information&amp;bull; Time Range: Data were collected from April to May 2024, reflecting employees&amp;rsquo; psychological state over the past 2&amp;ndash;3 weeks.&amp;bull; Spatial Range: Respondents were all located at on-site workplaces in a Middle Eastern region, classified as a high-risk and unstable area.&amp;bull; Resolution: Individual-level data; no specific spatiotemporal resolution required.3. Data Content and Structure(1) Raw Scale Score Data (326 records)&amp;bull; Row Labels: Each record represents one employee&amp;rsquo;s complete assessment result (326 rows in total).&amp;bull; Column Labels:◦ Basic Information (14 columns): ID, age, gender, education, marital status, number of children, etc.◦ Work Characteristics (8 columns): Job type (management/frontline), years of service, shift cycle, day&amp;ndash;night rotation, consecutive days on duty, weekly overtime hours, etc.◦ Lifestyle (4 columns): Number of cohabitants, smoking, drinking, exercise habits.◦ Scale Scores (80 columns): Raw scores for 8 scales, classification results (e.g., &amp;ldquo;depression detected&amp;rdquo;), and sub-dimension scores (e.g., emotional exhaustion under burnout).&amp;bull; Units of Measurement:◦ Continuous variables: Age (years), years of service (years), days on duty (days), overtime hours (hours/week).◦ Categorical variables: Gender (male/female), education (junior high school to bachelor&amp;rsquo;s degree), marital status, etc., encoded as categorical values (e.g., &amp;ldquo;1 = married&amp;rdquo;).◦ Scale scores: Scored according to standard rules for each scale (e.g., PHQ-9 total score 0&amp;ndash;27).(2) Assessment Questionnaire&amp;bull; Includes an 87-item structured questionnaire covering all items and options of the above 8 scales.4. Data Missingness and Error Notes&amp;bull; Missing Data:◦ Some fields in EXCEL contain blanks (marked as &amp;ldquo;(blank)&amp;rdquo;), such as open-ended questions left unanswered (e.g., reasons for sleep disturbances).◦ Missing Data Handling: Valid case analysis was applied; no imputation methods were used.&amp;bull; Sources of Error:◦ Subjective bias in self-report scales (e.g., social desirability effect).◦ Sampling bias: Male participants accounted for 99.7%; female sample was very limited (n=1).◦ Cultural differences: The validity of some scales (e.g., social support) may be limited in cross-cultural contexts.5. File Format and Usage Recommendations&amp;bull; File Format:◦ DOC.◦ Standard .xlsx format (compatible with Excel, WPS, etc.).&amp;bull; Applicable Software:◦ Statistical Analysis: SPSS, R, Python (pandas library).SummaryThis dataset systematically assessed the mental health status and influencing factors of construction employees assigned to high-risk areas in Iraq using standardized scales. It includes both raw data and survey instruments, making it suitable for research in occupational health psychology and cross-cultural adaptation. Caution is advised regarding the gender imbalance in the sample and the potential influence of cultural context on scale validity.</dc:description>
  <dc:subject>mental health; construction workers; expatriate employees</dc:subject>
  <dc:creator>Yang Chuanjiang</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Li Meihui</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Zhang Chun'e</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Gu Gonglu</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights>RESTRICTED</dc:rights>
  <dc:type>dataset</dc:type>
  <dc:publisher>Science Data Bank</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>

    </metadata>
</record>
</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>