<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/static/oaitohtml.xsl"?>

<!--
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
-->

<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <responseDate>2026-10-12T15:30:08Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="10.57760/sciencedb.j00124.00459" >https://www.scidb.cn/oai</request>
<GetRecord>
    <record>
    <header >
    <identifier>10.57760/sciencedb.j00124.00459</identifier>
    <datestamp>2026-04-27T10:01:08Z</datestamp>
</header>
    <metadata>
        
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:date>2026-04-27</dc:date>
  <dc:title>Original data of the article 'Effect of ZrO2 Crystal Phase on the Catalytic Performance of the Reverse Water-Gas Shift Reaction'</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.57760/sciencedb.j00124.00459</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:description>1 Experiment Section&amp;nbsp;	All chemicals and reagents for synthesis, including Zirconium nitrate (ZrO(NO3)2&amp;middot;xH2O), urea and methanol, were purchased from Aladdin Chemical, the chemical purity was Analytical Reagent and the chemicals were used without further purification.&amp;nbsp;The reaction gases, including hydrogen (H2, 99.999%), carbon dioxide (CO2, 99.999%), nitrogen (N2, 99.999%), helium (He, 99.999%), argon (Ar, 99.999%), deuterium (D2, 99.999%) and a 13.3%CO2/53.3%H2/33.4%Ar&amp;nbsp;mixture, were supplied by Taiyuan Taineng Gas Co., Ltd. and used as received without further purification.&amp;nbsp;Deionized water with a resistivity higher than 18.5 M&amp;Omega; was used throughout the experiments.&amp;nbsp;1.1&amp;nbsp;Catalyst Preparation	m-ZrO2&amp;nbsp;and t-ZrO2&amp;nbsp;were synthesized using the hydrothermal method[27,28]. As a typical synthesis method, to synthesize m-ZrO2, 9.26 g of ZrO(NO3)2&amp;middot;xH2O was placed in a 200 mL Teflon-lined vessel, 80 mL of deionized water was added, and the mixture was vigorously stirred until completely dissolved. Then, 24.08 g of urea was added, and stirring was continued for 0.5 h. The synthesized gel was transferred to a stainless steel autoclave and held at 190 &amp;deg;C under static conditions for 32 h. The resulting precipitate was washed four times with deionized water by centrifugation and then dried at 110 &amp;deg;C for 12 h. Finally, the ground catalyst was calcined at 400 &amp;deg;C for 4 h with a heating rate of 2 &amp;deg;C min-1. t-ZrO2&amp;nbsp;can be synthesized using methanol as the solvent and following the same synthesis procedure as for m-ZrO2.&amp;nbsp;1.2 Characterization of the Catalysts	Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the m-ZrO2, t-ZrO2, and c-ZrO2&amp;nbsp;catalysts were conducted on a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer with a nickel-filtered Cu K&amp;alpha; (&amp;lambda; = 0.15418 nm) radiation source operated with an operation voltage of 40 kV and an operation current of 50 mA, the test range is 5-90&amp;deg;. The ZrO2&amp;nbsp;phase is determined by comparing the diffraction pattern with the PDF card data in the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) database.	Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) of the m-ZrO2, t-ZrO2, and c-ZrO2&amp;nbsp;catalysts were acquired on a JEM-2100F high resolution transmission electron microscope with an operation voltage of 200 kV. The samples were dispersed in ethanol and then placed on an extra-thick carbon film for analysis.	In a liquid nitrogen environment (-196 &amp;deg;C), the structural properties of the sample were measured using the Jingwei Gaobo JW-BK 200 specific surface area and pore size analyzer. The specific surface area was determined by the Brunauer&amp;ndash;Emmett&amp;ndash;Teller (BET) method. Before testing, the catalyst was degassed under vacuum at 200 &amp;deg;C for 5 hours.	Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) spectroscopy of various m-ZrO2, t-ZrO2, and c-ZrO2&amp;nbsp;catalysts were recorded at -129 &amp;deg;C on a JEOL JESFA200 ESR spectrometer (9.087 GHz) at a modulation frequency of 100 kHz, a microwave power of 0.998 mW, and a modulation amplitude of 0.35 mT. Before testing, the samples were treated in a glove box under four atmospheres of Ar, H2, CO2, and CO2+H2&amp;nbsp;(13.3% CO2/53.3% H2/33.4% Ar) for 1 hour, with a treatment temperature of 450 ℃&amp;nbsp;and a gas flow rate of 30 mL min-1.	Quasi in situ XPS experiments of the m-ZrO2, t-ZrO2, and c-ZrO2&amp;nbsp;catalysts were conducted on an ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer equipped with a reaction chamber&amp;nbsp;using a monochromatic Al anode K&amp;alpha; radiation (1486.6 eV) as the excitation source. Prior to the measurements, the samples were pretreated in a glove box under atmosphere of N2&amp;nbsp;with a&amp;nbsp;flow rate of 30 mL min-1&amp;nbsp;at 450 &amp;deg;C for 1 h.&amp;nbsp;Subsequently,&amp;nbsp;the samples were directly transferred into analysis chamber for XPS measurements&amp;nbsp;without exposure to air. The likely charging of sample was corrected by fixing the&amp;nbsp;binding energy of the adventitious carbon (C1s) to 284.8 eV.	H2-D2&amp;nbsp;exchange&amp;nbsp;and CO2&amp;nbsp;temperature-programmed desorption&amp;nbsp;(CO2-TPD)&amp;nbsp;experiments were conducted&amp;nbsp;on a self-built fixed reactor coupling with an online HIDEN QIC-20 gas phase mass spectra (MS). For the H2-D2&amp;nbsp;exchange&amp;nbsp;measurement, 100 mg of m-ZrO2, t-ZrO2, or&amp;nbsp;c-ZrO2&amp;nbsp;catalyst was subjected&amp;nbsp;to&amp;nbsp;in situ treatment under an Ar atmosphere with a flow rate of 30 mL min-1&amp;nbsp;at 450 &amp;deg;C&amp;nbsp;for 0.5&amp;nbsp;h&amp;nbsp;and then cooled down to RT naturally in Ar&amp;nbsp;atmosphere. Afterwards, the gas&amp;nbsp;was switched to a mixed atmosphere containing 5% H2&amp;nbsp;and 5% D2&amp;nbsp;balanced with Ar with a total flow rate of 31.5 mL&amp;nbsp;min-1&amp;nbsp;at RT. The outlet gases containing HD&amp;nbsp;(m/z&amp;nbsp;=3), H2&amp;nbsp;(m/z&amp;nbsp;=2), and D2&amp;nbsp;(m/z&amp;nbsp;=4) were recorded by the MS.	For the CO2-TPD&amp;nbsp;measurement, 100 mg of m-ZrO2, t-ZrO2, or&amp;nbsp;c-ZrO2&amp;nbsp;catalyst&amp;nbsp;was in situ purged in&amp;nbsp;Ar with a flow rate of 30 mL min-1&amp;nbsp;at 450 &amp;deg;C&amp;nbsp;for 0.5&amp;nbsp;h. Next, the sample was cooled down to RT naturally. Pure CO2&amp;nbsp;was subsequently introduced into the system with a flow rate of 30 mL min-1&amp;nbsp;at&amp;nbsp;RT for 1 h till to saturation. Finally,&amp;nbsp;the sample was purged by pure Ar&amp;nbsp;with a flow rate of 30 mL min-1&amp;nbsp;at 450 &amp;deg;C for 0.5 h and then&amp;nbsp;heated to 600 &amp;deg;C&amp;nbsp;at a heating rate of 5&amp;nbsp;&amp;deg;C min-1. The desorbed CO2&amp;nbsp;(m/z&amp;nbsp;=44) signal was recorded by the MS.	In situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transformed spectroscopy (DRIFTS) experiments were performed on a Nicolet iS50 FT-IR spectrometer equipped with&amp;nbsp;an in situ high-temperature reaction cell (Harrick Scientific Products, Inc.) in series mode with 256 scans and a resolution of 4 cm-1&amp;nbsp;with an MCT/A detector.&amp;nbsp;For in situ&amp;nbsp;DRIFTS&amp;nbsp;measurement of the stepwise reactions of first CO2, then CO2&amp;nbsp;+ H2, and finally H2, 100 mg of m-ZrO2, t-ZrO2, or&amp;nbsp;c-ZrO2&amp;nbsp;catalyst&amp;nbsp;was purged by pure Ar&amp;nbsp;with a flow rate of 30 mL min-1&amp;nbsp;at 450 &amp;deg;C for 0.5 h, and then&amp;nbsp;heated to 500 &amp;deg;C and stabilized for 10 min, whose spectra were taken as the background spectra. Then, 13.3% CO2&amp;nbsp;balance with Ar with a flow rate of 30 mL min-1&amp;nbsp;for 0.5 h at 500 &amp;deg;C and the time-resolved DRIFTS spectra were collected&amp;nbsp;for 0.5 h until&amp;nbsp;saturation. Afterwards, 53.3% H2&amp;nbsp;was introduced in the presence of CO2&amp;nbsp;(CO2:H2&amp;nbsp;= 1:4) balance with Ar with a total flow rate of 30 mL min-1&amp;nbsp;and corresponding time-resolved DRIFTS spectra were collected&amp;nbsp;for another 0.5 h until stability. Finally, CO2&amp;nbsp;was withdrawn to keep a 53.3%/H2&amp;nbsp;balanced with Ar atmosphere with a total flow rate of 30&amp;nbsp;mL min-1&amp;nbsp;at 500 &amp;deg;C, simulating surface carbonaceous species hydrogenation reaction, whose time-resolved DRIFTS spectra were collected&amp;nbsp;for another 0.5 h.	&amp;nbsp;1.3&amp;nbsp;Catalytic Performance Evaluations and Kinetic Measurements	CO2&amp;nbsp;hydrogenation to CO reaction was conducted in a&amp;nbsp;fixed bed reactor&amp;nbsp;using the reaction gas consisted of 13.3% CO2&amp;nbsp;and 53.3% H2&amp;nbsp;(CO2:H2&amp;nbsp;= 1:4)&amp;nbsp;balanced with He with a total flow rate of 30 mL min-1.&amp;nbsp;Prior to measurement, 100 mg of m-ZrO2, t-ZrO2, or&amp;nbsp;c-ZrO2&amp;nbsp;catalyst was placed in quartz tube and loaded into the fixed-bed reactor. Afterwards, reaction gas was introduced and the sample was heated to the desired temperature at a ramp rate of 5 &amp;deg;C&amp;nbsp;min-1&amp;nbsp;and then held for 50 min until the reaction reached a steady state.&amp;nbsp;The composition of the gases after the reaction was analyzed&amp;nbsp;using an on-line gas chromatography (FULI 9790 Plus) equipped with a TCD detector and a flame ionization&amp;nbsp;detector (FID). The CO2&amp;nbsp;conversion was&amp;nbsp;calculated&amp;nbsp;on basis of the change in concentrations&amp;nbsp;of the inlet and outlet gases CO2&amp;nbsp;(Eq. 1). The product selectivity&amp;nbsp;was calculated from the ratio of individual products to total products&amp;nbsp;(Eq. 2). The carbon balance&amp;nbsp;was taken&amp;nbsp;into account&amp;nbsp;in our system. 	&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Conversion.CO2=(nCO2,in&amp;nbsp;&amp;ndash; nCO2,out)/nCO2,in&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;(Eq. 1)	SelectivityCH4orCO=nCH4orCO/(nCH4+nCO)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;(Eq. 2)	Reaction orders of H2&amp;nbsp;or CO2&amp;nbsp;were conducted at 400 &amp;deg;C&amp;nbsp;using the same procedures as the activity measurement. All CO2&amp;nbsp;conversions were controlled below 15% without the thermodynamic equilibrium and mass transfer limitations. Reaction order of H2&amp;nbsp;was acquired by keeping the CO2&amp;nbsp;pressure at 12.1&amp;nbsp;kPa and changing the H2&amp;nbsp;pressure from 27.5&amp;nbsp;kPa to 55.5&amp;nbsp;kPa. Reaction order of CO2&amp;nbsp;was acquired by keeping the H2&amp;nbsp;pressure at 55.5&amp;nbsp;kPa and changing the CO2&amp;nbsp;pressure from 6.1&amp;nbsp;kPa to 12.1&amp;nbsp;kPa.</dc:description>
  <dc:subject>ZrO2 catalysts; crystal phase effect; reverse water gas shift reaction; oxygen vacancy</dc:subject>
  <dc:creator>Zhang Zhenhua</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Luo Qunxing</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>yang yang</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Li Ruiying</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights>PUBLIC</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
  <dc:type>dataset</dc:type>
  <dc:publisher>Science Data Bank</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>

    </metadata>
</record>
</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>