<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/static/oaitohtml.xsl"?>

<!--
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
-->

<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <responseDate>2026-10-12T13:09:52Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="10.57760/sciencedb.j00289.00472" >https://www.scidb.cn/oai</request>
<GetRecord>
    <record>
    <header >
    <identifier>10.57760/sciencedb.j00289.00472</identifier>
    <datestamp>2026-08-18T14:48:35Z</datestamp>
</header>
    <metadata>
        
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:date>2026-08-18</dc:date>
  <dc:title>The unreported result dataset of the empirical study on supply chain shareholding and corporate green innovation</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.57760/sciencedb.j00289.00472</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:description>This dataset serves the empirical analysis of the paper &amp;quot;Supply Chain Shareholding and Corporate Green Innovation: From the Perspective of Cognitive Role Theory&amp;quot;, aiming to supplement all the statistical test results that were not presented in the main text due to space limitations. The original data samples were taken from databases such as CSMAR and CNRDS, and the research period was from 2007 to 2023 for Chinese A-share listed companies. The core independent variables are the primary and secondary terms of the supply chain shareholding ratio, the dependent variable is green innovation, and the control variables cover four dimensions of indicators: company characteristics, governance structure, financial performance, and research and development level. The analysis used a fixed effects panel model and performed 1% and 99% quantile truncation on continuous variables. This dataset directly displays the final statistical results.The dataset is a Microsoft Word file containing detailed results of endogeneity processing, robustness testing, mediating testing, and moderating analysis. The endogeneity treatment section reported the results of five strategies, including instrumental variable method, propensity score matching, Heckman two-stage model, core variable lagged one period regression, and adding additional control variables. The robustness test includes replacing green innovation measurement methods, changing estimation models, subsample regression, and introducing multidimensional fixed effects. In the mediating test, the similarity of environmental information disclosure was used as a proxy variable for management attention allocation. The rationality of this variable was analyzed from three perspectives: behavioral representation, cognitive cost, and strategic signals. Then, the regression results of the empirical test using a three-step method were reported. The moderating effect is based on cognitive role theory, and reports the regression results, moderating effect plot, and inflection point changes of three moderating variables: regional environmental regulatory pressure, corporate operational risk, and CEO environmental experience.</dc:description>
  <dc:subject>Endogeneity; Robustness; Mediating effect; Moderating effect</dc:subject>
  <dc:creator>hu yun ge</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Wang Duo</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Meng Delin</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Li Yanxi</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights>PUBLIC</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/</dc:rights>
  <dc:type>dataset</dc:type>
  <dc:publisher>Science Data Bank</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>

    </metadata>
</record>
</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>