<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/static/oaitohtml.xsl"?>

<!--
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
-->

<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <responseDate>2026-10-14T18:22:06Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="10.57760/sciencedb.psych.00441" >https://www.scidb.cn/oai</request>
<GetRecord>
    <record>
    <header >
    <identifier>10.57760/sciencedb.psych.00441</identifier>
    <datestamp>2025-01-14T16:56:44Z</datestamp>
</header>
    <metadata>
        
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:date>2025-01-14</dc:date>
  <dc:title>The Impact of Move Structure of Exemplary Narrative on Reader Attitudes</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.57760/sciencedb.psych.00441</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:description>	This study employed a between-subjects experiment in which participants read a weight-loss narrative featuring a protagonist, Xiaomei. The experiment manipulated the narrative&amp;rsquo;s move structures, varying between sequential move structures and interwoven move structures. We aimed to establish a causal relationship between move structure and narrative appeal, and to explore a social comparison-based mediating mechanism. Participants (N = 320), recruited through a Chinese online platform, were representative of the general population. After excluding participants who failed a manipulation check assessing attentive reading, the final sample consisted of 264 participants (190 female, 74 male; Mage = 29.14 years, SDage = 7.44; MBMI = 21.70, SDBMI = 2.85).	The experimental procedure involved participants being randomly assigned to read one of the experimental narratives. Each narrative was presented over eight pages, with a minimum viewing time of 8-11 seconds per page to ensure reading comprehension. A two-item multiple-choice manipulation check, asking &amp;ldquo;Which of the following best describes the protagonist&amp;rsquo;s weight-loss journey?&amp;rdquo; was used to exclude participants who failed to demonstrate attentive reading.	Subsequently, participants rated: (1) the appeal of the story using three 7-point scales (1 = not at all, 7 = very much), assessing favorability, enjoyment, and attractiveness; (2) their willingness to read similar stories on the platform (1 = not at all willing, 7 = very willing); and (3) their willingness to subscribe to the platform for similar stories (1 = not at all willing, 7 = very willing; Cronbach's &amp;alpha; = 0.881). This multidimensional approach sought to provide a comprehensive attitude assessment, encompassing both immediate reactions and long-term engagement intentions (Zhang &amp;amp; Chen, 2015).	Next, participants completed a questionnaire assessing potential mediating variables, including social comparison. Social comparison tendency was measured using a modified version of the Iowa-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure (INCOM; Gibbons &amp;amp; Buunk, 1999), translated by Bai, Liu, and Liu (2013). We selected items relevant to the narrative context and focused comparisons within the context of reading weight-loss stories, including: (1) &amp;ldquo;When reading this story, I focused on the differences between myself and the protagonist&amp;rsquo;s weight-loss journey&amp;rdquo;; (2) &amp;ldquo;While reading, I compared myself with weight-loss bloggers&amp;rdquo;; (3) &amp;ldquo;When reading, I tried to understand what the protagonist thought when facing difficulties&amp;rdquo;; (4) &amp;ldquo;While reading, I often wondered what the protagonist would do if faced with a weight-loss challenge like mine&amp;rdquo;; and (5) &amp;quot;After reading, I would like to know more about weight-loss information, and I will try to find out what others think about weight loss&amp;rdquo; (1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree; Cronbach's &amp;alpha; = 0.826). Higher scores indicate greater social comparison during reading.	To control for potential confounding factors, two 7-point scales (1 = very negative, 7 = very positive and 1 = very unnatural, 7 = very natural) were adapted from Berger et al. (2021) to assess narrative valence and naturalness.	Finally, participants provided demographic information, including gender, age, height, and weight, as control variables.</dc:description>
  <dc:subject>Narrative Structure; Self-Control; Social Comparison; Move; Propp</dc:subject>
  <dc:creator>Iris Yu</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights>PUBLIC</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</dc:rights>
  <dc:type>dataset</dc:type>
  <dc:publisher>Science Data Bank</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>

    </metadata>
</record>
</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>