<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/static/oaitohtml.xsl"?>

<!--
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
-->

<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <responseDate>2026-10-12T06:48:00Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="10.57760/sciencedb.psych.00671" >https://www.scidb.cn/oai</request>
<GetRecord>
    <record>
    <header >
    <identifier>10.57760/sciencedb.psych.00671</identifier>
    <datestamp>2025-06-20T11:39:17Z</datestamp>
</header>
    <metadata>
        
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:date>2025-06-20</dc:date>
  <dc:title>&amp;ldquo;Choosing the lesser of two evils&amp;rdquo;: The neural mechanisms of outcome evaluation in mixed intertemporal choices</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.57760/sciencedb.psych.00671</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:description>	Mixed intertemporal choice involves health, economic, and social domains, but the neural mechanisms underlying the evaluation of mixed intertemporal choices have not been fully elucidated. This study employed event-related potential (ERP) technique and recruited 46 college students to explore the neural mechanisms underlying the evaluation of mixed intertemporal choices (i.e.,smaller and sooner loss, larger and later gain (SSL-LLG)&amp;nbsp;and&amp;nbsp;smaller and sooner gain, larger and later loss (SSG-LLS)) through two experimental conditions:&amp;nbsp;separate evaluation conditions&amp;nbsp;(n = 24) and&amp;nbsp;joint evaluation conditions&amp;nbsp;(n = 22).&amp;nbsp;The results showed that negative loss feedbacks&amp;nbsp;elicited&amp;nbsp;a more negative FRN amplitudes&amp;nbsp;than positive gain feedbacks, and the P300 amplitudes&amp;nbsp;triggered by negative loss feedbacks&amp;nbsp;was significantly lower than that induced by positive gain feedbacks&amp;nbsp;(Experiment 1). The FRN amplitude for SSL-LLG choices&amp;nbsp;was more negative than that for SSG-LLS choices, while P300 amplitude differences between these two conditions were not significant.(Experiment 2). In summary,&amp;nbsp;loss choices&amp;nbsp;elicited stronger loss perception and reduced cognitive resource allocation; emotional experience and cognitive resource engagement in outcome evaluation of mixed gain-loss options were similar to those of pure loss intertemporal choices.&amp;nbsp;Loss perception was greater in SSL-LLG than SSG-LLS conditions, eliciting stronger negative emotions, though cognitive resource use did not differ significantly&amp;nbsp;between this&amp;nbsp;two&amp;nbsp;choices. This explains individuals&amp;rsquo; preference for SSG-LLS choices as a strategy of &amp;ldquo;choosing the lesser of two evils&amp;rdquo;.&amp;nbsp;Therefore, understanding the neural mechanisms of loss perception holds practical significance for encouraging more rational decision-making behavior.</dc:description>
  <dc:subject>mixed intertemporal choices; ERP; outcome evaluation; FRN; P300</dc:subject>
  <dc:creator>Wang Haokui</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Tan Yutong</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Zhao Cuixia</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights>RESTRICTED</dc:rights>
  <dc:type>dataset</dc:type>
  <dc:publisher>Science Data Bank</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>

    </metadata>
</record>
</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>