<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/static/oaitohtml.xsl"?>

<!--
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
-->

<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <responseDate>2026-10-15T04:06:51Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="10.57760/sciencedb.psych.00721" >https://www.scidb.cn/oai</request>
<GetRecord>
    <record>
    <header >
    <identifier>10.57760/sciencedb.psych.00721</identifier>
    <datestamp>2025-09-19T08:31:39Z</datestamp>
</header>
    <metadata>
        
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:date>2025-09-19</dc:date>
  <dc:title>The attentional mechanism of own-race bias:&amp;nbsp;Evidence from the&amp;nbsp;Stroop effect</dc:title>
  <dc:identifier>doi:10.57760/sciencedb.psych.00721</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <dc:description>Own-race bias&amp;nbsp;in face recognition is a well-known&amp;nbsp;phenomenon, with previous explanations focusing on&amp;nbsp;perceptual expertise or social cognitive factors.&amp;nbsp;However,&amp;nbsp;few studies have directly examined how attentional&amp;nbsp;mechanisms&amp;nbsp;differ&amp;nbsp;between own- and other-race faces. This study employed a face-word Stroop paradigm&amp;nbsp;in&amp;nbsp;four experiments to&amp;nbsp;explore these differences.&amp;nbsp;Experiment 1 was carried out with full attention, where upright faces were shown in Experiment 1a and inverted faces in Experiment 1b. Experiment 2, on the other hand, was conducted under divided attention, with upright faces presented in Experiment 2a and inverted faces in Experiment 2b.&amp;nbsp;Results&amp;nbsp;showed&amp;nbsp;that own-race faces elicited a larger Stroop effect than other-race faces&amp;nbsp;when&amp;nbsp;upright, regardless of&amp;nbsp;attention&amp;nbsp;conditions. However, this advantage disappeared when faces were inverted, indicating&amp;nbsp;the&amp;nbsp;importance&amp;nbsp;of holistic processing&amp;nbsp;in own-race bias.&amp;nbsp;Critically,&amp;nbsp;when word presented on eyes,&amp;nbsp;the Stroop effect for upright own-race faces was significantly&amp;nbsp;increased under&amp;nbsp;insufficient attentional resource condition, becoming comparable to&amp;nbsp;upright&amp;nbsp;other-race faces.&amp;nbsp;These results&amp;nbsp;suggest&amp;nbsp;that&amp;nbsp;own-race bias&amp;nbsp;is influenced by&amp;nbsp;both quantitative and qualitative differences in attentional engagement. This study&amp;nbsp;offers&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;new&amp;nbsp;attentional framework&amp;nbsp;for&amp;nbsp;understanding&amp;nbsp;cross-race face recognition.</dc:description>
  <dc:subject>Face; Own-race bias; Stroop; Holistic processing; Attention</dc:subject>
  <dc:creator>Enguang Chen</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Hailing Wang</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights>RESTRICTED</dc:rights>
  <dc:type>dataset</dc:type>
  <dc:publisher>Science Data Bank</dc:publisher>
</oai_dc:dc>

    </metadata>
</record>
</GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>